HOOD CANAL BRIDGE CLOSURE MITIGATION PLAN

Port Townsend Chamber of Commerce Position Paper
March 14 , 2002

The proposed Hood Canal Bridge closure mitigation plan, as it now stands, fails to adequately address the short and long term negative impacts on our communityís tourism industry. Missing from the PRTPO presentation on the two ferry options were the following:
 


It is felt that the PRTPO presentation was geared more for moving people off the Olympic Peninsula and little attention was given to accommodating travelers to the peninsula.

The tourism industry is the 2nd largest industry in Jefferson County. The impact of the Hood Canal Bridge closure will be significant if visitors from the I-5 corridor must drive south to Shelton and then north on SR101 to reach our area. There is little doubt that visitors will seek other destinations not only during the scheduled bridge closure but even after the bridge is reopened.

We believe it is imperative that direct access from Edmonds/Kingston to Port Townsend must be part of the Hood Canal Bridge closure mitigation plan. Direct access between Edmonds/Kingston and Port Townsend is not optional. More can be done to help mitigate the impact of the bridge closure both long and short term. We recommend the following:
 


We believe the traffic interruption caused by the bridge closure will adversely affect Jefferson and Clallam Countiesí tourism industry. Regardless of the projected length of time the bridge is closed for repairs, we believe the impact will carry over for the remainder of the summer and possibly longer. However, we believe the Hood Canal Bridge repair project can serve as a catalyst to improve alternative transportation links to the Olympic Peninsula. Therefore, we intend to advocate for the above recommendations.